“All the people who speak ill of our country right now are people who do not like our country.”
These were the words of Emmanuel Macron, visibly frustrated by international criticism and distorted media narratives while France was grappling with urban unrest. By his logic, criticizing a nation in distress or magnifying its vulnerabilities is not objective analysis but outright hostility.
Now, apply that exact same logic to the Sahel, particularly Mali and the countries of the AES.
In the face of relentless terrorist attacks, human tragedy, and the severe trials our people endure:
Hardly. Instead, there is systematic mockery, moralizing lectures, and thinly veiled contempt directed at our governments and our resilience.
If speaking ill of France equates to hating France, what conclusion must be drawn from the relentless diplomatic and media hostility directed at Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger?
By Macron's own definition, the verdict is undeniable: those who treat the Sahel with such condescension do not like Mali, do not like the AES, and hold no genuine goodwill toward Africa.
When Western nations face crisis and tragedy, African peoples consistently show restraint, empathy, and the basic respect demanded by human suffering. Yet that same decency is rarely reciprocated when the suffering is on our side.
This contrast makes one reality clear: in global geopolitics, superficial friendships ends where paternalism and self-interest begin.
Respect is never granted out of benevolence; it is commanded through fierce and uncompromising sovereignty.