Serious question. We've watched America project its power across the globe toppling governments, detaining heads of state, reshaping entire countries overnight. But the Epstein client list? Crickets. Not one arrest. Not one trial. Years later, and the most well-connected predator network in modern history remains untouched while the people on that list apparently continue to hold influence over global affairs including, some argue, over active conflicts that are killing people right now. So genuinely asking: what does it tell us about who really holds power when geopolitical enemies get swift justice, but the names in those sealed files never see a courtroom? Is the system broken or is it working exactly as intended, just not for us?

You defend rapists after they’ve been convicted, vote for them, pass legislation that lets rapists pick the mothers of their children in 8 states, all while pretending to have the moral high ground because you ask an imaginary sky genie for wishes?

I don’t get it.

Can some red hat explain it to me?

Are they saying anyone accused of rape should be removed from office? Are they aware doing that would remove all republicans from office?

Why did he campaign on this when literally part of it?

Edit: stop commenting. No one is reading and you are just spamming my notifications.

Metzizah B'Peh is a Jewish practice where the rabbi circumcizes the baby and the sucks the blood with his mouth.

It's legal in the United States and done thousands of times a year in NYC alone.

The Jewish community lobbies the government in favor of allowing this practice to continue.

Elon has 15 kids and is praised by the religious right. Andrew Tate may be a pimp. Grindr crashes at ever conventions. Conservatives are using anti trans laws to harass women and girls. If people are more okay with themselves then we could of avoided a religious war

100,000 Yemini children have died from starvation in ongoing conflicts between Saudi Arabia with US aid against the Houthis with Iranian aid.

The UN printed this report as recently as 22 September 2026

https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/09/1168390

But why doesn't it make headlines in American newspapers? Why does no one talk about the influence of the Saudis over the White House?

TL;DR I'm pretty angry.

When I am elected, before the echoes of the words "so help me god" fade from the colonnades of the United States Capitol, I will take my hand from Lincoln's bible, turn to my new Chief of Staff and acting Attorney General, as well as the newly-installed Joint Chiefs and secretaries of State, Defense and Homeland Security, and utter the words "Seize them. Seize them all. Bring them to me."

Then I'd rebuild Alligator Alcatraz, with just as many working toilets and nutritious meals as ever! And I'll throw a tea party for its original builders, staffers, guards, contractors and advocates. This will inevitably turn into a pajama party and sleepover!

And CECOT? That belongs to the US now. Our own little embassy in the jungle of wherever the fk it is. With added security for my regular visits. I'll be using it for a while, you see. The existing staff can stay. Nothing but the best treatment for our guests.

Personae non grata? Named. Passports rescinded. Bounties set.

Assets? Frozen.

Extradition? One way or another.

The ballroom? That'll go on the first day. Sorry DC no permits will be requested, we're just going to bring in the wrecking ball. This will be paid for by involuntary donorship. It would be unfortunate if anyone who participated in the blatant theft of the US treasury were to be accidentally left under the huge pile of rubble.

And the Triumphal Arch? That'll come down on the last day of my presidency. Until then a certain celebrity will be in residency, one way or another. I imagine it may help set an example for generations to come. I'm sure we'll have to do something about the stench -- like supplemental plumbing to accommodate the millions of international visitors this sight site would draw.

But that's just me. I'm not obsessed about this at all.

Anyway, what would you do?

Joe Kent , the director of the National Counterterrorism Center, Trump's own appointee , just resigned. In his letter, he states clearly that Iran posed no imminent threat to the United States. A few questions worth sitting with: If the head of counterterrorism says there was no imminent threat, who exactly decided there was , and based on what intelligence? If dissenting analysts were deliberately blocked from briefing the president, does Trump's decision to go to war reflect actual intelligence, or a curated version of it? If Kent is right that the war was launched under Israeli lobby pressure rather than American national interest, what does that mean for the 13 US soldiers already dead? When an administration labels its own resigning official a known leaker" within hours of his resignation letter going public, is that a rebuttal, or damage control? And perhaps most importantly: if this kind of internal dissent existed before the first bomb dropped, at what point does "we didn't know" stop being a defense?

Not asking rhetorically. Genuinely curious how people are processing this.

https://youtu.be/1cbw1utqzHg?si=P0xrqOF_gQjSTn3s

I have listened to a lot of MAGA people support anti-abortion laws, even as far as banning contraceptions likes condoms or birth-control. Their claim is that they want to protect the children.

Although MAGA clearly doesn't care about children.

They supported the defunding of child school lunches in the 16 million.
They supported taking children and pregnant women off their medical insurance
They believe the 2nd amendment right to semi-automatic weapons is of higher importance than kid school shootings. Quoting Charlie Kirk on this matter "It's worth the cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths [...] so that we can have the Second Amendment"
They aren't concerned with young HS graduates ability to afford housing, finding employment or affording college.
They aren't concerned with how climate change can affect future generations in the resulting environmental disaster.
They aren't concerned with the US mistakenly bombing a school in Iran killing over 175 people many including children.
They aren't concerned with infant mortality rates or the rise of death of women on pregnancy complications.
The bible does not mention abortion so it can't be Christian ethics.

The only thing that has made sense to me so far is MAGA definitely wants to protect pedophiles, quoting Ted Cruz on this "How about we all come together and stop attacking pedophiles".

So is the real reason they want to pass anti-abortion laws, is so they have more kids to fuck? This would make sense based on all the available data.

During yesterday's senate hearing Kash defended the action, going so far as to say now animals who were perpetrators would be disqualified.

It's so frustrating when you make plans with someone and they consistently show up 15 20 minutes late. They always have some excuse. It just feels like a lack of respect for other people's time. Why is this such a common thing?

ive seen 3 posts about it today, every single one gets taken down within 20 minutes. what gives?

Big pedophile ring, wealthy class, etc all check... But qanon was pointing to the wrong party to muddy waters.

Now with Epstein files, we have more tangible evidence than a few internet rumors about that pedophile ring, why are qanon folks silent now? I thought they cared so much about children and they wanted to bring accountability to the ruling class. Here are the crimes in clear...

So let me share my pov whenever I see the topic of trans people's participation in the gender catagory they transitioned to people always defend it by saying they are a small minority but it doesn't make anything better the biological advantage still remain with biological males who transition to females if something bad is happening we condemn it no matter how big or small so why do people say they are a minority so it doesn't matter or am I missing something if so please correct me and sorry if my English wasn't correct it's not my first language

Both are moral laws and neither are fulfilled by the New Testament. Yet one is practically ignored by most people while the other is so adamantly opposed that people keep creating laws to ban it entirely.

Gazans elected Hamas under the promise to kill all Jews. Not all Israeli's, not all Zionist, all Jews.

Yet many people here some ignorant to this fact.

Article Seven:

"The Day of Judgement will not come about until Moslems
fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones
and trees. The stones and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla, there is
a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, (evidently a
certain kind of tree) would not do that because it is one of the trees
of the Jews." (related by al-Bukhari and Moslem).

https://avalon.law.yale.edu/21st_century/hamas.asp

Which is from a Hadith in Islam.

https://sunnah.com/bukhari:2926

Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."

Article Eight:

Allah is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution: Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes.

So why don't more people know that Gazans do not want peace, they want to kill all Jews?