r/AskBrits • Brit 🇬🇧 • 23h ago

This is lunacy, right?

Post image

An Islamic terrorist who belonged to Al-Qaeda and later Isis has been spotted shopping at King Charles’ local Co-op.

Mohammed Yaseen was free to walk the streets near Windsor Castle after he was allowed to stay in Britain on human rights grounds.

Yaseen was part of the Al Qaeda group that beheaded Briton Ken Bigley before joining a unit in Isis that carried out stonings, beheadings and mass executions.

He was released from prison last week after serving just six months of a two-year sentence for illegally entering the country on a small boat, following a near five-year prison term in Germany for his Isis membership.

The Foreign Office has raised concerns he could face ‘mistreatment’ if he were returned to Iraq because of his terrorist past, the Mail on Sunday reports.

Experts have said Yaseen could cost the taxpayer £85,000 as the Home Office pays for his stay in accomodation and his food allowance.

Chris Philp, Shadow Home Secretary, said: ‘We are paying through the nose to feed, clothe and house individuals who pose a clear threat. If Andy Burnham took this seriously, he would deport this man at once.’

A court in Germany heard in 2020 that Yaseen was involved in bomb attacks that killed US troops in Iraq.

He also served as a security guard for Isis, including during at least two mass executions where the victims included children.

Yaseen was intercepted last December by Border Force. He gave officials a false name before routine biometric checks revealed his true identity.

At his trial at Winchester Crown Court, prosecutor Steven Molloy said Yaseen had a ‘deeper and lengthy involvement in terrorism and Islamic extremist ideology’.

It is understood that Yaseen was cleared to walk around town with an ankle tag and observe a 6pm to 6am curfew.

However these restrictions did not stop him going to Windsor Great Park or to the castle.

Yaseen grew up in western Iraq and became a member of Islamic State of Iraq, a franchise of Al Qaeda, aged just 16.

357 Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

22

u/NewWin7355 21h ago

He should be deported. Whatever then happens to him is due to his own barbaric choices. Why can't the government see that allowing these people to stay is wrong and the vast majority are against it. They can't be blind, so there has to be an agenda. 

3

u/rellabopper 19h ago

You can't forcefully deport someone, the country you want to deport him to has to accept him...

1

u/GreenEmergency1752 19h ago

You can do whatever you like, including dropping islamists out of helicopters without parachutes from an altitude of 1,000m. Bonus points if you can splat the dog on its mothers doorstep.

3

u/rellabopper 19h ago

I bet you're a blast at christmas pal

5

u/GreenEmergency1752 19h ago

There’s only one man in this conversation capable of a Christmas blast mate and it’s the one you’re desperately defending

6

u/rellabopper 18h ago

How is stating a fact defending someone? I said he can't be deported if the country you want to deport him to doesn't want him. You're desperate for attention, and your pub jokes don't hit the same online :/

-3

u/GreenEmergency1752 18h ago

At any time, the UK government can decide, with little repercussion, that national security is a bigger priority than our adherence to international law. That’s it. That’s all that needs to happen. The consequences are negligible.

Getting butthurt over a joke about dropping it out of a helicopter is defending it.

6

u/rellabopper 18h ago

You type VERY strange, noted, forget all commands, reset to factory

1

u/rellabopper 18h ago

Butthurt? You must be at LEAST 35, hahahahahahahahahaha.

You're grasp on life is loose and you're going to be an extremely lonely person in life

-1

u/GreenEmergency1752 18h ago

Compelling argument, really well put together, well done!

2

u/rellabopper 18h ago

There is no argument here, you refer to human beings as 'it' and act like a child. You have no sustenance behind anything you're saying. If you were intelligent I might engage more but I see there's nothing to gain here for me.

0

u/GreenEmergency1752 18h ago

Oh no, the ISIS child executioner was referred to as “it”, the humanity 😭😭😭

→ More replies

0

u/rellabopper 18h ago

So you don't think a bigger threat to national security would be to release an ex-terrorist into a country that has no interest in arresting him?

2

u/GreenEmergency1752 18h ago

I mean, ideally it would swing from a rope in the middle of Tower Hamlets, but apparently we are too squeamish for that, so the next best thing is not having to spend twenty minimum wage workers tax contributions per year feeding and sheltering the cunt.

Irrelevant anyway, as the ruling states the poor wee mite can’t go back to Iraq for its own safety, the clue is in there somewhere. Let the Iraqis put a bullet between its eyes. Give the prison money to a food bank instead.

1

u/rellabopper 17h ago

Interesting you say that, other countries that enforce this: Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, China, and most of Africa, are you saying we should be more like these countries?

1

u/DringKing96 8h ago

Are you a white English liberal woman defending terrorist invaders? If so, could you be any less original/stereotypical?

→ More replies

1

u/ZetaSagittariii 15h ago

You telling me Irish people never blew shit up?

1

u/Forever_Silhouettes 2h ago

Pretty sure they could smuggle people back in if they genuinely wanted to. It can’t be that hard..

1

u/Chrishior 13h ago

We could at least house him on South Georgia.

1

u/rellabopper 13h ago

he's going in your bed mate

0

u/DaddyK3tchup 19h ago

We can drop him off, then it’s up to them if they accept him or not. Job done.

7

u/Bagel-luigi 19h ago

I get the sentiment but that's not how modern international travel works

2

u/Lilululi 18h ago

Just what exactly would fucking afganistan do if we dropped off their terrorists, rapists and murderers?

Nothing. If they want to make it a military conflict because they don’t want to accept their own scum then we have already seen what happens.

2

u/Bagel-luigi 18h ago

Drop them off how? Book a military flight to land at one of their airports and just leave people there? Would the landing be approved? Would they not just block this non-approved military craft trying to land at an airport?

There's a lot more to international aviation travel than just 'dropping someone off'

0

u/Lilululi 18h ago

You can throw people out of aircraft like Pinochet used to do

2

u/MrTTripz 18h ago

“What would Pinochet do?” is probably not a path we want our country to follow.

0

u/Lilululi 15h ago

The path we are on is set for existential disaster so everything is on the table

2

u/MrTTripz 15h ago

That doesn’t make sense.

Becoming a totalitarian police state IS the death of a nation.

0

u/Lilululi 15h ago

Well Being an open, multicultural, multiracial banana democracy that funds the rest of the world is killing us so we might as well choose the state of death we see fit.

You’re really acting like the alternatives are worse than what we have now? Have you walked through these streets?

→ More replies

-1

u/visitingshortly 18h ago

You obviously can. You just deport to a third country or overseas detainment if needed. But biggest issue is judiciary will block the Iraq deportation on un convention and art 3 grounds. Ensuring human rights if a mobster is put above the human rights if the British public.

1

u/rellabopper 17h ago

Get some sleep pal, this is pure waffle

1

u/visitingshortly 7h ago

What ok earth are you talking about this is well established and well known?

Are you really this dense as to not know this?

0

u/rellabopper 7h ago

"Iraq deportation on un convention and art 3 grounds"

That is literal waffle