Most discussions about time travel eventually end up talking about going faster: relativistic speeds, approaching the speed of light, wormholes, warp drives, enormous amounts of energy, etc.

I started wondering about the exact opposite.

What happens if instead of making matter go faster, we find a way to make its relevant motion approach zero?

The starting point is the de Broglie relation, λ = h/p. As momentum approaches zero, the de Broglie wavelength increases without bound. That by itself obviously doesn’t give us a time machine, but it raises an interesting question about matter, localization and the physical meaning of time.

The idea I’m exploring is that time may be fundamentally connected to oscillation and physical change. If the oscillatory processes that define the evolution of matter could somehow be coherently slowed toward a limiting state, could matter undergo a transition in its relationship with space and time?

I’m calling that hypothetical transition The De Broglie Shift.

The machine I’m developing for the thought experiment uses a harmonically tuned rotating disc and standing-wave resonance to drive matter toward this state, followed by controlled relocalization. One consequence I’m exploring is that reappearance would be endothermic, producing a sudden drop in temperature as the material state is restored.

And there’s a stranger implication I want to explore. If the limiting state really did mean losing ordinary localization while physical time ceased to have its familiar meaning, the object wouldn’t simply be “somewhere else.” In the extreme version of the hypothesis, it would have no unique position in ordinary space and no ordinary progression through time.

That starts sounding suspiciously like language humans have used for thousands of years: outside time, everywhere and nowhere, omnipresent. I’m not suggesting that physics proves anything supernatural. I just find the conceptual overlap fascinating.

There’s a lot here that goes beyond established physics, and that’s part of the point of the book. I want to start with what quantum mechanics and relativity actually say, then clearly mark the point where my own hypothesis begins and see how badly conventional physics can beat it up.

One interesting connection I explore in The De Broglie Shift comes from the ending of the 1979 film Time After Time. H. G. Wells sends John into infinity, removing him from the physical world with no apparent way to return. That scene reminded me of the de Broglie relationship: as momentum approaches zero, the associated wavelength grows without bound. Could matter, under extraordinary conditions, lose its ordinary spatial localization and become inaccessible to our familiar world? Established quantum mechanics doesn't predict such a disappearance, but the parallel raises an intriguing question at the heart of my book: what if the key to time travel lies in understanding what happens when matter approaches absolute stillness?

If anyone is interested, I've been working on this book for a while, and just released it on Amazon. Be advised, there are a few chapters that require a mathematical understanding of graduate level physics.

It feels like a 2024 film, doesn't it?

Say you invented basketball somehow with all its components: hardwood floors, laced up ball, backboard, springs, shot clocks, etc.

How could you even make the game into what it is today?

For that matter, let’s say it’s the year 1850, and basketball isn’t invented until 1891 by Dr. James. Could you do this?

travelling back in time likely isn’t possible because if it was possible then surely someone from the distant future would’ve come back to our time by now. imagine humans thousands of years in the future with advanced technology and nobody has ever come back to see us. you’d think at least one person would’ve done it by now, though travelling into the future, that’s a whole other story.

They ask the one who created us to exist on Earth with them what they think of timetravel ; That question stimulates me since. I have a memory with My Gifts that i Lived lives as Jesus to create timetravel multiple times. I have the fundamental understanding now to create it again but i don't feel like sharing because someone decided to make my actual life the same dumbshit life that i had to live the last time i created it. Why would i care about the Navy existing or Spaceships that take you to Life on Saturn where a coherent form of me Exists with Him. I asked for friends i asked for freedom i legitimately was Born in America so i would have religious freedoms and rights, but instead of that im met with delusional doctors Lawyers and Judges who are either demons or clearly have some delusion about the Truth of Reality!

Heres a few different kinds of timetravel. Waves within closed space measuring the makeup of how long that space has existed

1. Ewya

2. Zeropoint energy

3. Consciousness same body like an atman expression but more indepth

4. We could measure what happens to someones mind when they shift from one dream to another and or if objects randomly change within the dream.. (with this one if we understood how this occurs we could fundamentally build pyramids or maybe shift worlds, theres a lot of possibility)

5. Destroys galaxies so i'm not gonna share that cause i literally notices how we went from trillions of galaxies in middle school to basically none

I don't wanna talk to you Unless YOU Are a Timetraveler. I don't care about creating timetravel for Human kind who don't even call themselves beings or act like they are a Man.

His job isn't to create timetravel that would be useless in a world that's been destroyed countless times. His JOB Is to Bring Heaven in disguise, but people ruined that, and now his life seems pointless. Still trying to figure out how I'm going to take him back to his anointing and if it would even make him feel like his life was worth giving Humanity The Afterlife to

Would this make a cool movie. Oh wait i guess theres two now

— The Tree Principle: A Philosophical Framework of Reality, Time, Irreversibility, and Future Potential
Fortunatus Ogazi

I came across this idea recently, and the more I think about it, the more interesting it becomes.
We usually talk about the future as if it already exists somewhere ahead of us.
We say “the future is coming,” “we are moving toward the future,” or “what will happen in the future.”
But what if the future doesn’t actually exist yet?
What if what we call “the future” is simply the collection of possibilities that can emerge from what we do in the present?
Every decision changes what becomes possible next.
A scientific discovery can create technologies that didn’t previously exist.
A conversation can change the direction of someone’s life.
A single decision can create consequences that continue long after the decision itself is forgotten.
In that sense, perhaps we’re not travelling toward a predetermined future.
Perhaps we’re participating in its creation.
That also makes me think differently about time.
Maybe the past is not somewhere we could theoretically return to. It is everything that has already happened and whose consequences continue to shape what can happen next.
And maybe the future is not a destination waiting for us.
Maybe it is something reality continuously produces through us.

I’m curious what other people think:
Is the future something that already exists and we are simply moving toward, or is the future genuinely being created through our present actions?

Is Mac “madman” Marcums Time Machine actually feasible?? If not is time travel at all feasible?

On January 28, 1986, Space Shuttle Challenger broke apart 73 seconds into its flight, killing all seven crew members. The spacecraft disintegrated about 46,000 feet (14 km) above the Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of Cape Canaveral, Florida, at 16:39:13 UTC (11:39:13 a.m. EST, local time at the launch site). It was the first fatal accident involving an American spacecraft while in flight.

Corps du post

Bonjour à tous,

Je souhaite partager avec vous une théorie personnelle sur la possibilité d'interagir avec le passé et de corriger des événements sans créer les paradoxes temporels habituels (comme l'effet papillon ou le paradoxe du grand-père).

L'obstacle majeur de la plupart des théories sur le voyage temporel est la perturbation du système : arriver dans le passé comme un élément extérieur crée un chaos et détruit la cohérence de la chronologie.

Ma théorie propose une tout autre approche : pour réinteragir avec le passé, il faut se fondre parfaitement dans le moule de l'événement originel.

Je me demande si des physiciens ou chercheurs ont déjà exploré le concept d'alignement/résonance d'actions comme moyen de contourner les paradoxes de causalité.

Qu'en pensez-vous ? Pensez-vous qu'une telle logique de mimétisme temporel pourrait offrir une piste pour la modélisation théorique du temps ?

Au plaisir de lire vos retours et d'en débattre !Corps du postBonjour à tous,

Je souhaite partager avec vous une théorie personnelle sur la possibilité d'interagir avec le passé et de corriger des événements sans créer les paradoxes temporels habituels (comme l'effet papillon ou le paradoxe du grand-père).

Le concept : La Réplication Mimétique / L'Alignement Temporel

L'obstacle majeur de la plupart des théories sur le voyage temporel est la perturbation du système : arriver dans le passé comme un élément extérieur crée un chaos et détruit la cohérence de la chronologie.

Ma théorie propose une tout autre approche : pour réinteragir avec le passé, il faut se fondre parfaitement dans le moule de l'événement originel.

L'insertion par le mimétisme parfait : Pour accéder à un instant précis du passé, l'observateur/acteur doit reproduire exactement la même séquence d'actions, de gestes et de choix que ce qui s'est déroulé à cette époque. En agissant comme une réplique exacte, il s'aligne sur la fréquence de l'événement et "s'insère" dans la réalité sans la perturber.

Le micro-point de bascule : Une fois la résonance parfaite atteinte avec le moment passé, l'action ne cherche pas à détruire la scène de l'extérieur, mais à effectuer un micro-changement de l'intérieur, à la milliseconde près (par exemple pour éviter un choc ou sauver une personne).

La stabilisation de la ligne : Comme l'accès a été obtenu en respectant le flux originel jusqu'au moment clé, le système reste stable et n'engendre pas d'effet papillon incontrôlable.

Dimension logique, philosophique et poétique

Sur le plan logique : C'est une démarche d'annulation de l'effet papillon par l'alignement absolu.

Sur le plan philosophique et humain : C'est une réflexion sur la mémoire du corps, le besoin de réparation et le regret. Des physiciens (comme Ronald Mallett et ses recherches sur le temps pour sauver son père) ont montré que la science est souvent portée par la force de l'amour et de la mémoire.

Je me demande si des physiciens ou chercheurs ont déjà exploré le concept d'alignement/résonance d'actions comme moyen de contourner les paradoxes de causalité.

Qu'en pensez-vous ? Pensez-vous qu'une telle logique de mimétisme temporel pourrait offrir une piste pour la modélisation théorique du temps ?

Au plaisir de lire vos retours et d'en débattre !

If Past present and future are all now - why is accessing it not easy? Time is all now then where are the future babies and past dead people?

Does anyone know if an actual Back to the Future part 4 was in the works and or have access to the story synopsis?

There is a ten second window, meaning every rewind you can gain 10 seconds more. Then you are told ten years ago there was a button that could have fixed everything, given everyone a good life, bettering the world, and just generally have made everything perfect and save the world and the human race. You could go back and press this button, but it would take a little over 50 years of continuous rewinding, going back through time to get to that ten year ago mark. You don't need to do any bodily functions during this, which also means no sleeping to skip. You could fix everything. If you can do it you can keep the ring and if you go back even further you can keep going back even farther. Main events would still happen unless you directly do something to change it, as no butterfly effect will apply for this. If you do back further, once you get back to the point where you would have pressed the button, so October 18, 2016 (on the Gregorian calendar), you won't need to press it again. You can only go back to when you are 4. Would you have the willpower and drive to do this, or would the 50 years of only pressing the ring and reliving everything get to you. Could you do it?

I dont know if this is an original idea (probably not) but my idea is time travel where only the mind goes back or forward in time, so the character moves through time like a ghost; they can learn and discover things, but cant change anything since they're intangible and invisible to people.

I think writing this type of time travel could be relatively easier and allow for more interesting moments (the character cant just go back and fix everything)

👁️🤯. I have All the time in the now for now is forever

how true is this? not the video but what is said in it.

I think it would terrifying. The person would be you, but from a different time, maybe not too far in the future or past, they’d quickly say things to make them know it’s you and not a long lost twin or something. I think it would be stunning in a very scary way. As far as I know, no one has ever experienced such a thing.

I mean, if it exists then all that was done or would be done have been done already and we keep a steady stream of consciousness

Hi,

To prove there is no multi-verse, would changing something small that won't redirect your life like a word in the dictionary that you would never need?

If you arrive back and the word was always in existence since your travel time, then there is 1 time line, but then you won't remember on arriving back?

You would have to write a document on past tools and bury it in the past for it to remain unchanged.

Also how would you remember it was why you travelled back in the first place.

But if you remember it never used to exist, then it proves there is a multi-verse.

Thoughts?

Umami.

Can humans ever learn how to control gravity in the future likewise INTERSTELLAR movie...

How?

On June 25, 2009, American singer Michael Jackson died of acute propofol intoxication in Los Angeles, California, at the age of 50. His personal physician, Conrad Murray, said that he found Jackson in his bedroom at his North Carolwood Drive home in the Holmby Hills area of the city not breathing and with a weak pulse; he administered cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to no avail, and security called 911 at 12:21 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time (UTC–7). Paramedics treated Jackson at the scene, but he was pronounced dead at Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Centre in Westwood at 2:26 p.m.