The Honorverse is a series of 14 novels written by David Weber, (along with a bunch of spinoffs) following the adventures of Honor Harrington, a naval officer in the Royal Manticoran Navy (Napoleonic era Royal Navy in space). Throughout the books, she rises through the ranks as Manticore fights a war of survival with the People's Republic of Haven (space Revolutionary France/Soviet Union). The series was inspired by the Horatio Hornblower novels. I absolutely loved these books as a teenager, and I've reread them a couple times as an adult with a more critical eye. I still enjoy them but I thought I'd share my thoughts on the series as a whole, both the positives and the negatives. Spoilers throughout.

The Good:

• Weber writes absolutely thrilling space naval combat scenes. I haven't read too many other military sci-fi books that are as gripping as the way he depicts the bridge of a starship under fire. He does a great job of keeping the action coherent and giving you a sense of what's happening throughout a battle.
• The tech is definitely on the softer side of sci-fi, but there's a very fun, consistent internal logic to the way the weapons and the different types of vessels interact. The tech evolves throughout the series over the course of a war lasting for 15ish years, along with the tactics that the different forces employ.
• It's fair to say that Honor is a bit of a Mary Sue, for lack of a better term. But Weber does a good job of consistently making her feel like the underdog.
• I think most of the antagonists are quite enjoyable POV's. Some of them are a bit more sympathetic, and the ones who are more on the mustache-twirling evil side of things, like Pavel Young, are usually guys you love to hate.

The Bad:

• The bloat starts to creep in at book 9, Ashes of Victory. It gets bad in book 10, lightens up in book 11, At All Costs, and then proceeds to completely take over from there. Huge chunks of the last 5 books (especially the last 3) won't make sense if you haven't read the spinoff novels, and SO MUCH of the plot consists of meetings and boring espionage stuff. It's not like Weber wasn't able to write entertaining stuff in the series that didn't revolve around combat, the earlier books have a lot of political maneuvering and palace intrigue, but for whatever reason he lost his touch. My recommendation is to treat At All Costs, which ends with a pretty satisfying conclusion, as the end of the series, and not bother with the later books- the drop off in entertainment value is that bad.
• Starting with book 10, War Of Honor, there's an extremely sweaty plot twist/retcon- it turns out that huge chunks of the events of the series so far were actually the result of a century-long conspiracy orchestrated by a planet of genetically modified fascists who think they deserve to rule the galaxy. It's dumb, it undermines the previous books, and by book 12 it's the central focus of the plot.

YMMV:

• Weber has some weird mix of conservative/libertarian/monarchist politics that you will encounter throughout the series. I will give him credit for one thing, he doesn't seem like a "women belong at home" type.
• Honor has two romances in the series. I think the first one is pretty touching, if cheesy, and sets up her arc in books 4-8. The second one is incredibly boring and takes up way too much time for something that unsatisfying.
• Lots of long infodumps throughout.

Overall, I'd still recommend the series if you're looking for naval-focused milSF. The space combat is that good, the different naval forces feel authentic and fully realized, and I think Honor is a pretty fun main character to follow. Just don't feel like you need to keep reading after At All Costs.

https://www.ursulakleguin.com/prize26

I was just thinking about how I probably don't read enough Australian books. NZ is close enough!

Has anyone written a novel or short story that explores how an alien species might cycle between unintelligence and intelligence over a long lifecycle, and most of the time is spent as unintelligent with intelligent technological phase lasting relatively short amount of time?

I of course mean:

Something Wicked This Way Comes by Ray Bradbury, pub. 1962.

A Night In the Lonesome October by Roger Zelazny, pub. 1993

Something Wicked This Way Comes, is a short novel which follows the supernatural events surrounding a strange carnival that visits Bradbury's small fictional Green Town late in October (October 24th) and two teenagers, a father and various townspeople. This could be described as a cross between a teenage coming of age crossed with horror/dark fantasy. But each description would do it a disservice and incorrectly offputting if you dislike either genre.

It's partly about individual temptation, empty desires, regret, and redemption. Written with Brabury's characteristic clarity and simplicity, it's one of his few "complete" novels.

I first read this book when I was teenager in the 80s and never lost my love of it. There is a little seen (flop) but very good Disney adaptation with Bradbury as scriptwriter of it from 1983 with Jason Robards & Jonathan Pryce.

A Night In The Lonesome October is an even shorter novel, you could read it in a single sitting. A daily dairy of October, it follows a cast of well-known gothic characters (The Players) from fiction over the month of October, leading to a final apocalyptic confrontation between The Openers and The Closers at Halloween. The diarist is a dog named Snuff, the familiar of Jack, who has the intelligence of a human, but not the characteristics. Yes. There are also many other familiars, who are centre stage, with their human companions slightly to the side.

This book is explicitly inspired by Lovecraft, Stoker, Shelly, Poe, Doyle, Bloch and even if you are only familiar with classic Universal Horror movies, you will recognise most of the characters.

It's less a thematic book than Something Wicked, but it is enormous fun. It is a loveletter to the above authors and genres, without being parody or pastiche. I reread this every few years because I enjoy it so much. It was Nebula nominated in 1994, along with Octavia Butler, Greg Bear, James Morrow & KSR!

I absolutely love these books, and would love if this post introduces them either of them to new readers.

I just finished this series and found it to be quite enjoyable.

The first book - "Ensign Year 1" - starts with a guy who really wants to join the space fleet and then...

Well, I can't say anything more without spoiling it, but I can say that the books are more about characters than giant space battles.

Some of the early- and mid- 20th century authors used a trope where humans would settle on a new planet and would then begin to physically adapt to that planet - usually sort of semi-mystically "because the air was different, because the light was different, because the chemicals were different, because the vibes of the planet were different" - and after a few generations the settlers would be a new and different "race" of people native to that planet.

(In Andre Norton you can sometimes even see the changes beginning in the first generation born on the new planet.)

- Andre Norton used this a lot.

- Jack Vance used this a lot.

- IIRC some of the pulp authors used this.

Any other authors or works?

Children of Time puts you inside a spider's sensory world for whole chapters. Embassytown does the opposite. Avice narrates all of it, first person, and she cannot speak Language, so the Hosts reach us through her description and her guesses. The book's central invention is described by someone standing outside it. You would expect that to be a limitation, but instead it reinforces the alien-ness. The Ariekei stay opaque because we only ever get to hear a person's impression of them, and every explanation is an approximation. It also means Mieville skips the contemporary trend of showing the alien mind from inside. Does that refusal explain why these aliens have aged better than more explicitly rendered ones? I can't think of another book that gets more alien by staying outside. Are there others?

I read a book in the early 2000s and I think the title was some sort of mishmash between “sing the body electric“ and “through a scanner darkly”. I remember that when you begin reading it it’s hard to place a time or country then you begin to realise it’s set in the future but where some people have started communities that are refusing new technology and have an almost Amish and religious existence without electricity. In the rest of this future earth, there are a lot of machine/human integrations and one is a way to compose and play music by wearing an ear/head attachment.

in my head it was set in a European city like perhaps Venice or maybe Amsterdam? I was thinking of it in reference to Luddites and AI refusal. I’ve asked the person who lent me the book years ago but he can’t remember it. I sort of vaguely think there might be a reference to a snail in the title as well?

I need to get hold of what it was for some art research!

thanks in advance to any super sleuth who can figure this out!!

Crossposting my request for good rebellion/resistance recommendations. Some great suggestions already, but just wanted to cast a wide net. Thanks for any suggestions!

If this is not the place for this let me know, its my first time posting about anything book related.

Okay.....i have scowered the internet trying to find a book i read somewhere 2016-2018.
Space opera
What i can remember main plot point wise though.

Two ace fighter pilots from opposing human nations.
One believes the other died during the war.
They later end up on a small ship together while investigating an ancient machine swarm that consumes planets and uses the resources to create more of itself.
One pilot begins hearing signals from the swarm and the crew follows those signals through dangerous wormhole travel.
Near the end of the book it is revealed that the pilot hearing the signals is actually an uploaded consciousness in a synthetic body and can mentally connect to the machine swarm.
He initially wants to shut himself down after learning the truth but the main pilot charcter wont let him until they deal with the swarm.

any hints or ideas?

Book number one of a ten book young adult science fiction series. There is also a two book sequel series and a seven book sequel series, nineteen books in all. I read the well printed and well bound POD (print on demand) trade paperback self published by the author in 2017 that I bought on Amazon in 2026. I have ordered books #2 and #3 in the series.

Jiden Armstrong is the older child of two archaeologists on the dry, dusty planet named Century. Jiden is fourteen planet years old which is equivalent to almost sixteen Earth years and just graduated from high school. She plans to intern at a logistics and supply company with her boyfriend but her parents refuse to sign the application. She fakes her mothers signature on the application, her parents find out, and send her to her grandmother to spend the summer there. Her grandmother immediately enrolls her in the five month military prep school that she runs for the planetary military.

This is a great story about making mistakes and overcoming difficult situations to make something of yourself. Somebody online recommended this book to me and I really enjoyed the book. If you are a fan of Heinlein juveniles then you will probably love this book also.

The author has a website at
https://kalspriggs.com/

My rating: 5 out of 5 stars
Amazon rating: 4.6 out of 5 stars (566 reviews)
https://www.amazon.com/Valors-Child-Children-1/dp/1546943978

Lynn

The prose are excellent and the book dives into the type of themes that are my bread and butter but I can only form a surface level connection to the book due to how terrible of a person David Selig is. He is immature, bigoted, insecure and a overall man-child. I want to know how other people feel/have engaged with this character? I can usually tell when a author is writing a despicable character but is not sympathetic to them. Did Silverberg mean for David to be a morally toxic person or was this a self insert?

I just finished The Three Body Problem and I’m mystified how it won the Hugo. It’s not even close to the quality of other winners like Dune and Hyperion.

I knew the characterization would be weak going into it, but the ideas “explored” didn’t make up for it at all. I thought the author would try to explain stuff like the complexity of the three body problem, nanomaterials, computing, etc so laypeople could understand them better, but he didn’t really try. Just seemed like he threw in half baked concepts he thought sounded cool.

It also felt like it was written without an editor. The main character’s wife and child show up for a few pages and then never again. The 3body gameplay was boring and a clunky way to give background about Trisolaris. There was a long backstory about how a math prodigy figured out solutions to the three body problem and it didn’t seem to have any affect on the rest of the book. None of the storylines felt like they had any stakes and the pacing was terrible.

I could keep going, but I’m just disappointed. I was excited about reading translated sci-fi. I wanted to like it and I gave it a chance. If it hadn’t won an award, at best it’s a mildly entertaining book and I can somewhat understand its popularity. But Hugo winners should be held to a higher standard and it is bad in comparison. I’m tempted to read some of the runners up that year to see if any are better, but I won’t be reading the rest of the trilogy.

I've been discussing a space-opera setting with some friends, and it got me thinking about something I've noticed in science fiction: sometimes authors seem to get so carried away with their own ideas that the story becomes secondary to the worldbuilding itself.

I'm not just talking about exposition that slows down the pacing. I mean lengthy, sometimes incredibly elaborate explanations of how a starship's engines work, how faster-than-light travel is possible, how its weapons function, or how some philosophical or political system supposedly works. The author may have clearly put a great deal of thought into these concepts, but the way they're presented can sometimes feel less like a natural part of the story and more like the author showing off how clever or intricate their ideas are.

At its worst, it can come across as self-indulgent, even a little kitschy - as though the reader is expected to be impressed by the sheer complexity of the concept, regardless of whether it actually adds anything meaningful to the story. Instead of making the fictional universe feel more convincing, all that detail can end up drawing attention to the author's effort to make it seem impressive.

Of course, I understand the appeal of well-thought-out worldbuilding. Consistent rules, interesting technological limitations, and original ideas can make science fiction much more compelling. And I know some readers genuinely enjoy learning every last detail about how a fictional universe works.

So I'm curious about other people's experiences: where do you draw the line between compelling worldbuilding and an author indulging in their own ideas at the expense of the story?

Do you enjoy lengthy explanations of fictional technology and systems even when they're not particularly relevant to the plot, or do you prefer authors to focus on how those things affect the characters and the events of the story? And are there any science-fiction authors or books that you think handle this particularly well or, conversely, examples where the worldbuilding feels like it's trying too hard to impress the reader?

PS: Sorry if I sound a little robotic, my english is far-far from perfect

Read through Seveneves and shocked at how dissapointing it was. The beginning of the novel starts with the moon getting exploded by an agent, which was a great premise. I couldnt wait to get to the part where humanity figures out what/who the agent was and what their motivation is for destroying the moon.

The novel just never acknolwedged it again. Hundreds of pages of dense technical information, awkward stilted dialogue, and a part two that reads like a fantasy novel. Why would Stephenson even allude to a bigger picture regarding the ambiguity of an agent and then just ignore it? Why not just add a throw away line of it being an asteroid impact?

The whole time reading it I was hoping the novel could have been part humanity surviving, and part humanity figuring out/dealing with an alien race who had some motive to blow up earths moon. The last page alludes to some purpose of humanity and possibly finding out what the agent is- but why not include that in the story? The book could have been half as long and been more than adequate for the story.

Curious on peoples thoughts. Is this just a cheap way to segue into a sequel? I dont think I will ever read another novel by Neal Stephenson again after the letdown of Seveneves.

Are there any good sci fi books/stories where robots exist, have sentience, have already gained equal rights with humans/other biological sentients, and everyone pretty much treats them equally?

I've read 2 Van Vogt recently, but they don't seem easy to find. Do people know a good source for the old stuff?

I overall liked this book. The scope was big, like really big. I did hope to hear something that happened to other parts of the universe after the expansion of the deep, possibly in the epilogue. Sadly that did not happen.

Touching parts were when blueshell's sacrifise and when Pham died and it was revealed that he had really experienced all that he thought that hi had, just beautifull send of to the character :)

I also quite liked reading the interactions between Skroderider's. Something about them wigling their leaves made them fell "cute" :)

I read the book on Finnish and the name of the Skroderider were translated as "kiesikäs". Kiesi means a car so that the translation was quite literal as in kiesikäs mean roughly something that has a car / or someone in a car or something like that. I studied the original names in English and the Skrode does not seem to mean anything ? I really would like to read a book about these creatures :)

Book number two of an eighteen book paranormal urban fantasy series. I read the well printed and well bound POD (print on demand) trade paperback self published by the author in 2017 that I bought from Amazon in 2026. I own books #3 and #4 in the series. BTW, the author's real name is John Van Stry.

Sean is a college student at University of Nevada in Reno, Nevada. He is a junior working on his computer science degree when he is brutally attacked and kidnapped by an unknown group of people just before his 21st birthday. He is rescued by his mother's neighbor and lifelong friend, Sampson, who turns out to be a were-lion. Sampson had promised Sean's long dead father to watch over his family, Sampson did so and died for his efforts. But, before dying, Sampson bites Sean and changes him into a were-lion.

Sean finds out that his father was an alchemist and was working on a alchemy to free the Lycans from the Magic Users. Which is why the Magic Users had Sean's father murdered. And now the Magic Users are trying to murder Sean and his friends sine they think that Sean will continue his father's work.

"WARNING: “Perfect Strangers” contains explicit sexuality, nudity, violence, bad language, attempted murder, actual murder, self-defense, pro-active self-defense, destruction of private property, vandalism, breaking and entering, tantric magic, polyamory, mayhem, gratuitous sex and violence, littering, breaking speed limits, a used car dealer, one Plymouth hemi, and some poor guy who just wants to earn a paycheck as a cashier."

This series is real pulp like old science fiction with lots of action and dialogue. I love it !

The author has a website: 
   http://www.vanstry.net/stryvant/ 

Warning: this series might be damaging to your savings account since there are so many books.

My rating: 4.6 out of 5 stars
Amazon rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars (3,283 reviews)
https://www.amazon.com/Perfect-Strangers-Valens-Legacy-2/dp/1979799490

Lynn

The Female Man is my favorite book of all time, but it feels so singular I’ve often had a hard time describing it, and therefore struggled to get recommendations for similar books. My question for fellow lovers of The Female Man: what are other books would you recommend? It doesn’t necessarily have to be similar in content or form, just a book you think fellow Female Man lovers would enjoy!

I don't know if any of you've read Ancestral Night by Elizabeth Bear. I just finished the book, and through-out the second half I was waiting for a twist that never came.

To explain; The story is set in a utopian future where humanity has joined a wast empire known as the Synarch where all the various alien races gets along and works together for the betterment of all. How they achieved this is through a process the book refers to as "Rightminding". This is where all individuals have a computer, called a fox, installed in their head and use it to "bump", or adjust their hormones, emotions, reactions and moods in order to be "self-aware" and "self-actualised". Rightminding can also be done by other's that you have given access to, such as friends, family, or AI's. If you have done something criminal, or behaved "sophiopatically" (sociopathic), it can also be done to you by the state. Though, the MC is clear to specify, it can't be done to you without your consent, but if you don't consent you will be locked up until you do "for the betterment of society".

The main antagonist in the book is a "pirate". The pirates refer to themselves as "Freeporters", and they don't subscribe to Rightminding. At some point the MC and the antagonist has to work together and the MC's fox gets damaged, turning off her rightminding. Up until this point, the MC has talked alot about how violent humans used to be, she refers to un-rightminded people as "child-like" and not self-aware. Everything related to a "natural" human experience is labelled as "Atavistic" (and you better get used to that word because it is used sooo much).

I assumed that the hypocrisy of the MC was done on purpose. She preaches acceptance of all and working together despite out differences and then turns around and condemns people who don't accept, what i would call, brain-washing. Throughout the book there are hints that the MC has had her mind and memories altered by the Synarch, and we do learn the details about this.

I thought there would come a point where she met herself in the door and discovered that she didn't turn into a murderous sociopath the second her rightminding was turned off. That she would realise that maybe forcing people to accept an alteration of their own mind and thoughts is not a good thing acutally, and maybe the Synarch is a bad organisation.

But no, it never happens. She gets her fox fixed and goes right back to adjusting her emotions so she doesn't feel angry when someone treathens to kill her, like a well adjusted person /s. The Synarch is the best possible way to do things, and the pirates are actually very evil and they do all like to murder and torture, so the MC was right all along. Humans are naturally barbaric and cruel and we all must adjust our very nature if we want to be able to work together.

Post script:

There is also a plot tread about an alien race that the synarch never managed to absorb. They had a war and the Synarch nearly wiped them out. Well, the other race was murderers anyway and has joined with the pirates...

Also, completely unrelated: the MC is very concerned about gangrene. Every single time she gets injured it's "I hope i don't get gangrene", "if i lose a finger to gangrene I would have to get a new one surgically installed", "I gave her a shot of broad-spectrum antibiotics, but I could do nothing bout the risk of gangrene" (all paraphrased). Why is this the author's go to? Where does she live that gangrene is the main concern?

Tl;dr:

In the book the "federation" only allows you to participate in society if you accept a device in you brain to control your emotions so you can prevent all the "negative" ones. According to the story this will help you become "self-aware". If you don't accept this "rightminding" you will be locked up until you do, because consent is important. This society is not the secret bad guy of the story.