r/Damnthatsinteresting • • 12h ago

Video Earth’s evolution measured in galactic years.

900 Upvotes

151 comments sorted by

130

u/Initial_Gear_7354 11h ago

Not through the milkyway, but with it

10

u/Kaporalhart 7h ago

hang on, is it this an artist's point of views, or is the sun's orbit really jagged like that ? Aren't all orbit trajectories ellipses ?

10

u/Larek_Flynn 6h ago

Elliptical with a single central mass to orbit. In a galaxy you are pulled towards the center on average but each part of the disk also pulls you. If your path would move up away from the disk, it pulls you back down. So it's like you orbit around the center while also bouncing up and down.

3

u/ObscureOperatorZ 4h ago

Kind of like a manta ray's flaps

91

u/LyqwidBred 11h ago

Its a cool little video, but it makes it look like sun is zipping around within the galaxy. I believe the entire galaxy is orbiting the center, so the entire spiral formation should be spinning in the video.

36

u/Kasern77 11h ago

Fun little fact: you'll notice that the orbit has a wobble where the solar system dips down and up past the galactic disc. Each time we're more likely to be exposed to the gravitational influences of other bodies passing by, which tugs on the Oort cloud and potentially makes asteroids bounces back inwards to us and increases the risk of Earth getting hit by an asteroid.

9

u/Slevin424 8h ago

Saddest part is we only have 20 or so orbits left before our sun dies. We’re in our midlife crisis stage of our solar system.

6

u/JesseMakeGoodChoices 6h ago

And we’re spending our precious time killing each other, enslaved, stressed, and putting a dollar amount to our worth.

2

u/Slevin424 6h ago

If we put all our effort into space we could have begun colonizing mars either by now or very soon. But we spend all our money and resources on weapons. We’re a sad race. Space telescopes on mars would be able to see much further than on earth to due low atmosphere and low light pollution. We’d know so much more of our universe.

25

u/sjayvee 11h ago

I feel so stupid.. the sun has an orbit?!

56

u/2LostFlamingos 11h ago

Everything goes around something else.

Sun moves around the center of Milky Way galaxy.

The galaxy itself is also moving.

The universe is incredibly complex.

13

u/Mysterious-Tackle-58 11h ago

Also, the sun orbits the common center of gravity in the sol-system. But since sol is like 99% of the sol-systems mass, the common center of gravity is within the sun.
BUT the star does wobble. And said star wobble is one way for scientist to see whether there is at least one planetary body around a star!

8

u/paddyo 4h ago

Just remember that you're standing on a planet that's evolving
And revolving at 900 miles an hour.
It's orbiting at 19 miles a second, so it's reckoned,
The sun that is the source of all our power.
Now the sun, and you and me, and all the stars that we can see,
Are moving at a million miles a day,
In the outer spiral arm, at 40,000 miles an hour,
Of a galaxy we call the Milky Way.

Our galaxy itself contains a hundred billion stars;
It's a hundred thousand light-years side to side;
It bulges in the middle sixteen thousand light-years thick,
But out by us it's just three thousand light-years wide.
We're thirty thousand light-years from Galactic Central Point,
We go 'round every two hundred million years;
And our galaxy itself is one of millions of billions
In this amazing and expanding universe.

Our universe itself keeps on expanding and expanding,
In all of the directions it can whiz;
As fast as it can go, at the speed of light, you know,
Twelve million miles a minute and that's the fastest speed there is.
So remember, when you're feeling very small and insecure,
How amazingly unlikely is your birth;
And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere out in space,
'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth

27

u/NachoEvans 11h ago

More mind blowing, there are galaxies that orbit ours, and the Milky Way is in an orbital dance with Andromeda. There are probably larger orbits that we don't see or understand yet, because all of human history has been too short to see or document them.

1

u/sjayvee 11h ago

Is there a science of orbits?? Is the orbiting motion as a force responsible for the expansion of the universe?

15

u/406highlander 11h ago

"Orbital mechanics" is the scientific study of orbits

1

u/sjayvee 11h ago

Fabulous!!! Ty

3

u/concept12345 11h ago

Probably a subreddit for that as well.

4

u/NachoEvans 11h ago

Off the top of my head, I don't think we can fully explain the expansion of the universe just yet and chalk it up to Dark Energy. As far as science of orbits, there is lots of stuff out there. Did a quick search and found this for example

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ac0436

-3

u/EagleDre 11h ago

Or it’s an illusion. I think we can say that out loud as a theory today without being considered a flat earther :)

10

u/MyPigWhistles 11h ago

The sun has an orbit (earth is in it), but the sun is also orbiting the galactic center. Together with our entire solar system. The entire milky way is also orbiting a shared center of mass together with the Andromeda galaxy. 

8

u/luisgdh 11h ago

And this center of mass orbits the virgo cluster. Which, in turn, orbits...

6

u/MyPigWhistles 11h ago

Maybe I'm wrong, but I think at this point we're not talking about actual "orbits" anymore. Or at least not clean orbits. Afaik, galaxies and clusters are more drifting through the universe, always affected by each other's gravity to different degrees, but not orbiting a clear center of mass. 

1

u/saint_of_thieves 11h ago

Yeah, I'm not sure I'd say that the Milky Way and Andromeda are orbiting one another either. At some point, a third galaxy could come close enough to tear either galaxy away like some sort of hand off. We can say that MW and Andromeda are affecting each other's movement.

2

u/manofth3match 2h ago

Milky Way and Andromeda are actually on a collision course and will merge in a few billion years.

1

u/saint_of_thieves 2h ago

Ah, yeah, forgot about that.

2

u/Inside_Swimming9552 11h ago

I think at a certain point galaxies are far enough away that the expansion of space overrides gravity.

I'm no physicist but I'd imagine this means that if there was a gravitational centre between clusters of galaxy's they would move further from that gravitational centre such that the circumference of the orbit increases by a larger amount than the amount of circumference travelled by the galaxies so they will never complete an orbit ever again.

1

u/GravitationalEddie 11h ago

And the sun(the center of it) orbits the solar system's barycenter.

6

u/OnyxProyectoUno 11h ago

We're in the milkway galaxy

6

u/Photon_Pharmer1 11h ago

There's always someone bigger...

4

u/sussydestroyer 11h ago

Everything in the universe orbits something bigger than itself

8

u/Truestorydreams 11h ago

So that means the sun is orbiting around the centre of the milky way?

3

u/Tight-Temperature670 11h ago

Yeah dude, there's a super massive black hole at the centre of our galaxy

2

u/wiltony 11h ago

Yep

3

u/Sweet-Explorer-7619 11h ago

Soo, what does the milky way orbit?

2

u/bardukasan 11h ago

Super duper black hole

2

u/snapplesauce1 11h ago

The galaxies orbit each other mutually as mass clusters in a point of balance as they travel thru space. Milky Way and Andromeda are in a spin with each other as they are closest to each other. But they're all spinning around each other instead of a larger central mass.

2

u/PantsLobbyist 11h ago

That’s a question with a bit of a longer answer. More-or-less, nothing. The Milky Way and the Andromeda Galaxy (along with the Local Group) “orbit” a shared centre of mass (they all orbit one another). We will eventually collide with the Andromeda Galaxy. Beyond this, as part of two superclusters (Virgo and Laniakea) we are all drifting toward the Great Attractor which itself is drifting toward the Shapely Supercluster. Unlike our circumstances with respect to Andromeda, due to universal expansion (dark matter keeps us accelerating at a rate which overcomes gravity), we shouldn’t ever reach the Shapely Supercluster. So while we’re being pulled toward it, we’re actually moving away from it.

1

u/SleepyTester 11h ago

Andromeda in the first instance, though they are more pulling toward each other than orbiting. Then the Local Group, a fifty-galaxy neighbourhood, then the Virgo cluster, then the Laniakea supercluster.

After that probably some larger cluster, I'm not sure where it ends

1

u/hereforyebeer 11h ago

Sagittarius A- a supermassive black hole about 4 million times greater than the mass of our sun.

The Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies have some gravitational relationship with each other and are actually on a collision course towards one another!

We’re also a part of the Virgo Supercluster, so we got that going for us.

1

u/sussydestroyer 10h ago

Yes, and the milky way also orbits around other clusters of galaxies and their center of mass/gravity.

This is how galaxies merge.

1

u/FembyThePinkProot 11h ago

Holy shit wait i wonder if it do.

3

u/Feisty_Can416 11h ago

Everything has an orbit my friend. Otherwise it wouldn’t be spacetime

3

u/Mirar 9h ago

It's ... uh ... not like the video but gravitational pull will make things orbit around each other, the shared mass center.

All the stars in the milky way share a mass center, so everything will orbit around that. Just like earth and moon share one and orbit around each other, and earth and sun (+ some other misc planets) share one and orbit around that. (Yes, the sun actually also orbits around that.) And the nearby galaxies also share one and will orbit around that. But now we're talking _sloow_.

The path of the orbits get a lot more involved if you're picky, but the approximation is good enough.

2

u/TerrapinStateofMind 11h ago

You're dead, didn't you know the wheel is turning and it can't slow down ⚡😂

1

u/sjayvee 11h ago

Haha yep! If the thunder don’t get ya the lightning will 🩷

2

u/Worth-Guest-5370 11h ago

I guess now we should begin auditing your other comments...? Take them in this new context?

2

u/jtcompound 10h ago

Unrelated, but if you had a ship with unlimited fuel and traveled at 9.8m/s2, to simulate earths gravity, it would take you about 20 years to reach the center of the milky way. After around three years you would reach 99.99% the speed of light and light. Just over 26,000 years would have passed on earth.

2

u/UnRealmCorp 2h ago

This is one trope I'm amazed has never shown up. In interstellar they sent one team. Why not send a other "backup" team a few years later with updated tech, resources etc. Wash, Rinse, Repeat. Eventually mankind is either gonna perish, or make something super advanced and catch up with the initial team at some point.

You arrive in 3 years to a planet that was supposed to be uninhabited and when you get there your great grandkids colonized the place.

1

u/sjayvee 10h ago

I need to watch Interstellar again lol

1

u/jtcompound 10h ago

I imagine when you got there, there would already be a human colony in place

2

u/SaltyTemperature 9h ago

And they’d have travelled faster than light, and be amused at the old timey chemical rocketship and dated tech showing up

4

u/James_T_S 11h ago

Yep. We are on a wild ride through the galaxy. Put your hands in the air!

2

u/sjayvee 11h ago

Haha! It boggles my mind, honestly. To realize we are all moving/ spinning… we just take it for granted because- Gravity!

2

u/LostnFoundAgainAgain 11h ago

Relativity, gravity is only a part in it all, there's more to it and it's rediculously complex.

1

u/Demonic_Storm 11h ago

just like we orbit the sun it orbits the milky way black hole, everything orbits the heavier object (and that is also a simplification, but good enough) but this vid is stupid and probably wrong, but i havent checked so dont take that as a fact

2

u/sjayvee 11h ago

lol thank you. Dizzying to think about! I’m sure I learned this in school but it probably broke my brain so i filled it away…!

2

u/Demonic_Storm 11h ago

no problem! and in case you are curious (and your brain can handle it XD) ill try to explain more in depth how it works, so its more than "light object orbits heavy object" is more that everything orbits a center of mass, you probably do know about that, but your understanding is probably focused on the center of mass of one object, so now try to imagine all of outer space (even the "empty" space) as one object, to make it easy lets just focus on the solar system, so the moon doesn't orbit the earth, the moon and the earth orbits the center of mass that's a little inside the earth (but not in the middle), and the sun and jupiter orbit each other around their center of mass, which is actually pretty "far" (in human measuring units) from the sun as far as i can remember, and it can get sooooo much more complicated than that, but that's as far as im semi-confident to say, as a fun fact there's also points in space (for earth's called Lagrange points) where you can put something orbiting empty space, kind of like just floating there, and one of those points is where the James Webb telescope is located

2

u/sjayvee 11h ago

Wowzers! Thx internet science friend 🩷

2

u/Demonic_Storm 11h ago

no problem!!, and if you are hungry for more, you should check out Kurzgesagt In A Nutshell in YouTube, they upload sciende videos (space, biology, physics and more) and they explain even better than i could ever, very fun to watch and their videos are always warranteed to be amazing

1

u/sjayvee 11h ago

Ooh thx!

0

u/Abdulbarr 11h ago

Been known for about 1400 years.

51

u/Chrono_Convoy 12h ago

Seems extremely oversimplified

114

u/WeatherStationWindow 11h ago

For a more realistic view, just look out your window.

8

u/Chrono_Convoy 10h ago

My window faces a Sydney Sweeney billboard

15

u/TheBigD-IA 11h ago

This comment is far too underrated, at the moment.

30

u/thanosisawhore 11h ago

In a 30sec video about earth’s entire evolution? Of course it is

12

u/NewSomethingUnlocked 11h ago

hard to make it more complex in 30 seconds

1

u/oryhiou 11h ago

Seems oversimplified in relation to what? Most of what was stated is true. Is there more to it? Absofuckinglutely.

9

u/Silly_Off 11h ago edited 11h ago

So do the different zones of the Milky Way affect our solar system in anyway as we rotate around it? Like how can we even test the passing of spiral arms of the Milky Way when they take millions of years? How could they definitely say that doesn’t play a role on how our planet behaves?

4

u/Slevin424 8h ago

It’s called speculatory science. We know we orbit around the galaxy. We know there’s a black hole in the middle keeping us there. And we know our Sun sometimes gets pulled slightly off course by passing other systems but never too far off course. So you take the systems we have to pass and can make an educated guess as to how much it changes our orbit. This video however is a very rough visualization. Very… rough.

2

u/Gyroscott 10h ago

Is that a Pokéball in the center of our galaxy?

3

u/Strong_Jello_739 11h ago

So what does the Milky Way orbit? From what we know everything orbits something

10

u/Astrogod07 11h ago

Everything is subject to gravitational forces, but that doesn’t necessarily mean a true orbit. The Milky Way is part of a local cluster of galaxies that are all strongly bound to each other and do roughly orbit the group’s center of mass.

Our local group is part of the Virgo Supepercluster of galaxies. While there is an incredibly concentrated mass that attracts objects within the cluster, at this point things don’t truly have a nearly defined orbit due to the strong and complex forces at play.

Above this scale, the expansion of the universe starts to truly counteract gravity. At the largest scales, the universe kind of pulls matter into large cobweb like structures with filaments stretching between and filed with clusters of mass.

2

u/BrilliantBig342 11h ago

Or is dark matter making it clump like this? Gravity on large scales ends up making things spheres. Idk just tossing it around.

1

u/Joverby 11h ago

the galaxies only formed because of dark matter. but yes we are sitting in a giant dark matter halo .

2

u/Big-Tax1771 11h ago

I read this in a Neil Degrasse Tyson voice and I don’t regret it.

1

u/Slevin424 8h ago edited 8h ago

There is a theory of a large orbit of the universe. It’s possible there’s a cluster of supermassive black holes. Like stupid big. We know these big boys exist as we’ve discovered TON 618 and Phoenix A. A cluster of those things would be powerful enough to be the center of orbit seeing as how we don’t exactly know the limits of a black hole.

2

u/Ragingdark 11h ago

Galaxies orbit nothing or each other.

2

u/Esilai 11h ago

The Milky Way isn’t orbiting anything. It’s part of the Local Group, a collection of galaxies that gravitationally influence each other. The Milky Way and Andromeda are currently on a collision course however.

4

u/XEagleDeagleX 11h ago

Sure would be interesting if I could trust a single thing made by AI

-1

u/[deleted] 11h ago

[deleted]

1

u/SeaCounter9516 10h ago

No they aren’t.

0

u/Mirar 9h ago

Um? It shows about 100 years around the galaxy in the animation, not 2 billion or whatever it should be

Movement is ish, vertical motion is exaggerated a lot and the solar system is ginormous

1

u/SaveUsCatman 11h ago

Wait, the sun is still going around the galaxy? Fuck my mind is blown

1

u/OutrageousRhubarb853 11h ago

We built the walls, we built the pyramids

1

u/ExtraEmuForYou 9h ago

It really is crazy to reframe your perspective on occasion.

Like, for example, we are spiritual beings piloting biomechanical suits of flesh and bone that exist on a planet that (to our knowledge) is the only planet that can support life like us, orbiting our Sun in a solar system that essentially acts as its own space ship of sorts as it orbits the center of a galaxy. This galaxy, in turn, has its own path of travel that is going to collide with another galaxy at some point.

It really makes you realize just how lucky we are, you know?

1

u/BrooklynRobot 8h ago

“… in its final moments”? I hope not!

1

u/Spacecommander5 4h ago

“Final “?

1

u/turbopro25 3h ago

Why did he say final moments? Are we cooked?

1

u/StemCellPirate 12h ago

The galactic year, also known as a cosmic year, is the duration of time required for the Sun to orbit once around the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. One galactic year is approximately 225 million Earth years.

Cosmic Year Archived 2014-04-12 at the Wayback Machine, Fact Guru, University of Ottawa

Leong, Stacy (2002). "Period of the Sun's Orbit around the Galaxy (Cosmic Year)". The Physics Factbook.

1

u/paxwax2018 11h ago

Everything shown here is wrong.

3

u/AryanPandey 11h ago

Explain how

1

u/oryhiou 11h ago

No, it’s not.

1

u/diyandmc240 11h ago

Right like why is the sun bouncing around on its orbit? It should be near circular or at a bare minimum elliptical. I tried to verify if there’s any reason it would be bouncing around like that, there isn’t any evidence that I could find

0

u/Retzl 11h ago

Spoken like a flat earther. "Im going to deny what years of research have helped conclude with an uneducated nuh uh"

Bring some proof instead of just denial, Dunning-Kruger.

2

u/paxwax2018 10h ago

The Galaxy is rotating and the sun with it. The model of the solar system spinning like that is long debunked.

-1

u/Retzl 10h ago

The video shows exactly that... did you not watch it? The sun is rotating, the galaxy is rotating... what are you talking about? Are you trying to claim the planets dont follow the sun thru its travels?

1

u/paxwax2018 10h ago

The sun stays in its arm of the galaxy it’s not rotating through it faster than the galaxy is spinning. The solar system isn’t travelling like that it’s not a useful representation of how it moves.

Why the Viral Vortex Animation is Wrong
Perpendicular Tilt Myth: Viral videos falsely show the planetary orbital plane perpendicular (90°) to the Sun's direction of travel. The real ecliptic is tilted at roughly 60°. [1, 2, 3]

Trailing Planets Myth: Because of this 60° tilt, planets are not dragged behind the Sun like a comet tail; they spend time both in front of and behind the Sun relative to its galactic path. [1, 2]

Vortex Fluid Misuse: A vortex is a fluid-dynamics term involving drag and friction (like water in a drain). Space is a vacuum, and planets are bound by gravity, not fluid resistance. [1]

2

u/Retzl 10h ago

The planets are in front of and behind the sun in the video. The person simplified that part of this to show something else. Nice use of AI btw -.- "Ai tell me exactly what I want to hear and disregard the topic at hand"

1

u/paxwax2018 10h ago

Uh huh, and the sun is zooming around while the galaxy stays still?

1

u/Retzl 9h ago

Do you remember in school when being taught about atoms they showed us a nucleus with static circles showing where the electrons orbital said nucleus? Do you remember when they told us later on that that isnt how atoms actually look ad that it was demonstration purposes to teach us?

They removed unnecessary information as to not bog down the point they were making. Its not that what they taught wasnt true, but it was the whole truth. I guess the nuance is lost on you tho :/

1

u/paxwax2018 9h ago

So both depictions are useless and wrong? Thats your big point? Wow.

2

u/Retzl 9h ago

No, my point is they sacrificed accuracy in one aspect to focus on a diff one. Like one does when making a 2d map of a 3d sphere, accuracy is lost somewhere. You need better reading comprehension...

→ More replies

1

u/ObscureOperatorZ 3h ago

Huh, planets also move in front of the Sun? TIL!

1

u/liquor-ice-mixer 11h ago

is there any side effects when the solar system gets closer to the smbh? in the animation it looks like occasionally we MUCH closer

3

u/MisinformedGenius 11h ago

I don't know why the animation does that, probably just to make it look cooler. The Sun takes a fairly circular path around the galaxy - it's slightly elliptical, but not by much. Its path also isn't quite a perfect ellipse because we're being affected by spiral arms, close-passing stars, and other concentrations of math. But again, nothing like the animation.

There aren't any effects so far as I know to being closer to the galactic center - we don't get very close. We are currently at a point in our orbit where we are closer than normal.

1

u/SeaCounter9516 10h ago

This animation is filled with things that are not exactly accurate.

1

u/emascars 11h ago

Damn, I had to check the numbers cause I couldn't believe it...

As someone very passionate about astronomy, I know very well the mindboggling size of the milky way, so I didn't expect that from heart creation to today it did roughly 20 revolutions... But the numbers don't lie...

Earth formed 3.7 billion years ago, and the milky way does one revolution every 225-250 million years... Life started forming 3.5-3.8 billion years ago... So yes, ~20 rev from earth formation and ~16 from early life formation...

It's absurd how fast the milky way rotates, it has a diameter of 100.000 light years... I did know that dark metter had to exist otherwise ordinary metter's gravity wasn't enough to keep it together, but Jesus Christ, one revolution per 230 years is FAST 🤯

1

u/Glass_Quarter_7586 11h ago

this is one of the biggest downfalls to the reality of teleportation/ time travel

0

u/halsoy 11h ago

You could still do it if you had the full coordinates in space time. But yeah, it wouldn't exactly be just "think of a place and go there" :p

1

u/5elementGG 10h ago

Serious question. Is there any correlation between the sun’s position in the galaxy to earth’s major events? Like mass extinction or something? Is there some region of the galaxy that’s more dangerous along sun’s orbit?

-3

u/Holiday-Policy-5107 11h ago

And yet, the stars have remained in the same position the entire time 🤣🤣🤣 seems legit

2

u/Conscious-Sun-6615 10h ago

stars are moving, if you go back 12000 years you’ll see different constellations in the sky

-25

u/[deleted] 12h ago edited 11h ago

[deleted]

8

u/MondayBorn 11h ago

I know a psychic who can predict the past

7

u/Burdenofbruce 11h ago

Weird, I know a historian who can predict the future

1

u/Astrogod07 11h ago

All of this has happened before, and all of it will happen again. So say we all.

9

u/Flying_Dutchman92 11h ago

We can calculate orbits and locations in 3-dimensional space. We do this all the time, from satellites to local planets. This is no different, just larger (time)scales.

-8

u/YouClutchh 11h ago

Those assume that things are always the way they are during our time, who’s to say that things weren’t drastically different 100 million years ago

With how easily the world recovers from natural disasters and man-made events, it’s not that hard to think that the universe could easily recover from crazy changes over the course of millions of years… We know nothing, we speculate and theorize, we can prove none of this, regardless of models, AI, or time scales

6

u/Squirrel_Kng 11h ago

Sounds like you’re having an existential crisis. This is the matrix bro and you’re just a dream.

2

u/Esilai 11h ago

We can outright measure the speed of things orbiting the galactic center using Doppler Shift. We can also see stellar remnants and solar systems in various stages of formation, so we have a fairly accurate picture of what the life of a star looks like. “We have no way of knowing” isn’t an argument. More of a tell that you don’t know anything about this field.

-1

u/YouClutchh 11h ago

But again, alot of it is speculative… When we’re looking in the rear view mirror, especially that far, there’s a lot of if thens that go into the conclusion. This is fact, yall just don’t like it.

2

u/Esilai 11h ago

We’re not speculating the entire field of astronomy. We can visually see things. We have hard measurements. That isn’t guesswork. You appear to have zero understanding of how modern astronomy works. You just don’t seem to like that people know more than you in a given subject.

8

u/Dr_Sus_PhD 11h ago

This guy thinks the past and the future are the same thing

-6

u/thechuckstar 11h ago

They are though... Linear time is a perception.

2

u/Dr_Sus_PhD 11h ago

Regardless of your thoughts on “linear time”…. They are not the same. They are still unique points in the spacetime continuum

Put down the weed and pick up a book before you keep spouting on about things, brother

-5

u/thechuckstar 11h ago

All time exists simultaneously, perception "determines" the difference.

2

u/Dr_Sus_PhD 11h ago

No, the difference is the point in space in which the time exists. It doesn’t matter if all time happens simultaneously, there are still defining points in spacetime that you can point to and say “it happened there”.

It doesn’t matter if it happens simultaneously. There are still different points, just instead of calling it past and future it would be coordinates.

What you’re saying is just fundamentally incorrect lol

0

u/thechuckstar 9h ago

Fundamentally incorrect *to you, seeing as how there are different broadly acceptable theories, without definitive conclusions. In your opinion, would you lean more towards growing block, presentism, or block universe theory?

1

u/Dr_Sus_PhD 9h ago

I’m not here to discuss different theories on the universe that you just googled.

The points I am presenting are supported by Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which has real world evidence to support.

If you disagree with me, you disagree with Einstein. Which is fine, but don’t put “*to you” in there like I’m pulling this out of my ass.

1

u/thechuckstar 8h ago

You were quick to accuse me of being high because I had an opinion, and you are quick to defend your position as well, so I don't understand why you're opposed to open dialogue. Many people disagree with Einstein. Bohr, Lenard, even Solovine. There's nothing inherently wrong with not agreeing on theories. I'm not an astrophysicist, but I am a casual fan of the science. Asking for your thoughts doesn't equate to being argumentative. And yes, Google is a fantastic tool since I, like you, am simply absorbing and regurgitating someone else's work, and not personally producing any meaningful information.

3

u/Mr_Norv 11h ago

Wrong pronoun. It’s “you” or in context of your sentence “I” not “we”. Astronomers have been doing this sort of Galactic dynamics for decades. Even determining galactic merger events over the last 4-5 billion years.

3

u/PeterPanski85 11h ago

r/flatearth go there, you'll find like minded people there (or relentless mockery, take this as a 50/50 challenge)

-5

u/YouClutchh 11h ago

Always the smallest dogs..be quiet

3

u/PeterPanski85 11h ago edited 11h ago

Found the flerf

Edit: because you deleted the comment ("Found the 50 year old incel").

For your info: I'm 41 🖕🏻

🤣

1

u/Flying_Dutchman92 11h ago

There comes the monkey out of the sleeve. You should just go back and listen to Graham Hancock.

2

u/KeeblerElff 11h ago

Quick question- how much of the Bible do you believe? Also this post led to denying the Holocaust so that’s weird

1

u/KeeblerElff 11h ago

They literally correctly calculate each eclipse. Hard to deny that they can’t ‘predict the future’ it’s math