r/A24 • • 5d ago

Discussion Crystal Lake - Spoiler Discussion Thread Spoiler

18 Upvotes

It’s very good! Jason gets his machete!


r/A24 • • 6d ago

Discussion You Can See Everything - Spoiler Discussion Thread Spoiler

Post image
465 Upvotes

Very excited for this opening. Reviews are enthusiastic with speculation that it could be an Oscar contender.

Go wild with spoilers here and let’s keep them off the rest of the sub. There’s going to be a lot to unpack with this one.


r/A24 • • 1h ago

Shitpost Thinking about making eggs tonight.

Thumbnail
gallery
• Upvotes

r/A24 • • 10h ago

Discussion The Ending of You Can See Everything Spoiler

794 Upvotes

Did I interpret this right?

That final conversation between Amanda and Nathan was such a great way to end the movie. It hilariously reveals Nathan becoming Elizabeth's next male defender after spending time with her. First, he goes back and edits a past conversation after reconsidering how it might make her look (he based what she said by how it made him feel). Then he suddenly jumps to defend her family and their love for one another, prompting Amanda to start interrogating him as she realizes he's been got.

And then the film cuts to the beach scene where Nathan likely began to develop feelings for Elizabeth.

Something tells me Amanda was instructed to ask the final question, as Nathan likely knew where he was going with this.


r/A24 • • 7h ago

Discussion From those who know Elizabeth Holmes best -- Why her "neurodivergence" in the film is an act

Thumbnail
258 Upvotes

r/A24 • • 9h ago

Discussion Underplaying the importance of the restitution order

241 Upvotes

Loved the movie, and wished they'd spent a little more time on some of the context that would help viewers understand what's happening behind the scenes.

One of those is Holmes's restitution order. TLDR: she has very good, very strong, and to a lawyer very obvious reasons to let her partner handle that deal and maintain her own ignorance of it. The movie gestures towards that but I think underplays it significantly.

She's required to repay $450 million to Walgreens and others, and they mention this a bit towards the end. But I was surprised to realize the people I saw the movie with didn't pick up on how important that point is, and how much it affects Fielder's questions about whether she's motivated by money or not.

We can't do a real legal analysis without knowing for sure whether they're married (I hear not, but don't know if that's true or even known for sure), what their prenup or other contracts say, and a few other basic facts. But if she personally reaches an agreement to receive income from the movie, it's subject to forfeiture. Having him negotiate it for her and put his name on instead of hers would help. If I were her lawyer I'd want her to stay as far away from the deal as possible. As in, make sure her partner gets paid so he and the kids benefit (and she does too, if it improves their lifestyle once she's out) but she can always say she had nothing to do with it. Down to leaving the room for negotiations and professing ignorance of the deal's terms forever after.

So the restitution order doesn't answer the question of whether she knew about the deal Evans reached, or was behind it. She could have been authentically ignorant of it because he's too controlling or because she's too saintlike. But the situation is exactly what you'd expect to see if two savvy people wanted to make money in a way that wouldn't be subject to the restitution order.

It makes me wonder about Evans's forfeiture of their profit share. Did he realize that it had been discussed on camera enough that the DOJ would come looking for their cut, and that the fight wouldn't be worth it? Did his lawyers tell him that acting as her business manager would make it hard to argue that the deal was entirely separate from her?

I'd love to see a writeup from a lawyer with more experience than me in family and/or criminal law.\

Edit - someone commented that I should have specified what movie I'm talking about. Obviously this is about Everything Everywhere All at Once.


r/A24 • • 1h ago

Discussion Shoutout to Merritt Wever in Primetime

• Upvotes

I know Primetime came out a few weeks ago, and now it's not even the newest A24 Lance Oppenheim film, but I keep thinking about Merritt Wever's performance in this movie. She's so funny, so thorny, and kind of ends up being the key to unlocking what the movie is all about. I wrote about it in more depth over on Substack (along with some thoughts about the movie as a whole and the arc of her career) but I thought I'd share an excerpt here for anyone else who loved the movie. Would be really cool to see her in the awards conversation for this performance!

At the press conference after Primetime’s Venice premiere, Wever spoke about wrapping up a long stretch of playing “open-hearted” women and being excited by the challenge of inhabiting someone who “almost willfully wants to deny her own humanity and the humanity of the people around her.” When an actor most known for their comic work takes on a dramatic part, it’s standard procedure to praise the turn for being “like we’ve never seen them before.” To be sure, this is exciting new terrain for Wever, and she gets to unleash a blisteringly acerbic side we rarely see. But the real power of the performance comes from the fact that, in many ways, she is quite similar to how we’ve seen her before. There’s just enough of a gap to leave room for doubt to creep in: about the ways that support can curdle into enabling, about whether doing something well means it’s worth doing at all, and about how easy it can be to root against your own humanity bit by bit until one day you don’t even notice it’s gone.


r/A24 • • 12h ago

Fan Art/OC Lance Oppenheim sure has been so busy this fall!

Thumbnail
gallery
140 Upvotes

In addition to directing Primetime and co-directing You can see everything (both for A24) -- he does the voice for this character in Wildwood. What a busy and talented man!


r/A24 • • 5h ago

Discussion What moment from an A24 film lives permanently in your head?

28 Upvotes

For me, it is this moment: The Zone of Interest; Rudolf Höss methodically walks through his house late at night, turning off the lights room by room in a mundane, everyday ritual. As the windows go dark one by one, the chilling banality of the domestic routine contrasts with the faint sounds and red smoke of the Auschwitz crematoria just over the wall.

I think about this scene every single night as I walk though my house turning all the lights off just before bed. It is seared into my brain. As I turn all the lights out, one by one, I ask myself, am I standing by and letting evil things occur? Am I complicit or implicated in someway to the evil acts that are happening around the world? What can I do to make sure I don't have to ask myself this question every night? What is my purpose in all of this?

For me, I believe this is the most powerful moment in any A24 film. Second place would probably come from Aftersun.


r/A24 • • 11h ago

Discussion You Can See Everything’s focus on single words Spoiler

85 Upvotes

I've seen a lot of feedback on the movie, and a lot of the insights people have are interesting and accurate. I really enjoyed the film and the conversations around it. But one minor recurring theme stood out to me, and it's the way the story kept centring on the choice of a single word. Three beats in particular felt like they hit at really powerful points in the movie.
1. "I created" vs. "they created." Early on, while we're getting to know Elizabeth, her husband, and her family, they debate the New York Times article. Did she say "a character I created" or "a character they created"? If we believe her, one word shifts our whole perception of her. If she said "I created," she's self-aware and manipulative, and her backpedaling ("no, I said they") is just more manipulation. If she actually said "they created," then the media is kind of on trial here, and we've all been duped into thinking she's a mastermind manipulator.
2. "Can." When they're talking about the Theranos device, Nathan says something like, "so I guess it's just that one word, can, that's causing all the issues." Same dynamic. If she genuinely believes in the way she's using the word, she's ignorant but not malicious. If she's fully aware of how it can be perceived, she is fraudulent and malicious.
3. "Something." In one of the later scenes with Amanda, they're reading the transcript from the prison, and Nathan revises his recollection from "I knew Billy was talking to you about it" to "I knew Billy was talking to you about something." Again, one word, and our whole perception of her (and of reality) hinges on it.

I thought this was a really interesting repeated theme, and each instance landed at a pivotal moment, almost like a summary of the act.


r/A24 • • 2h ago

Fan Art/OC In honor of Milly Shapiro as Charlie in Hereditary!

Post image
13 Upvotes

Saw someone posted earlier about an AMA with Milly Shapiro so I spent this afternoon coming up with this one. Had a ton of fun making it and super stoked with the end result. Hereditary was the first movie I saw as an adult where afterwards I was laying in bed thinking “damn..am I about to sleep with the lights on?” 😂


r/A24 • • 3h ago

Discussion YCSE - Won’t someone please think about the eggs Spoiler

9 Upvotes

I saw the film yesterday and I’m still reeling. But in all of the reviews, comments, videos, etc that I’ve seen since, no one is talking about the coercive control aspect of Liz and Billy’s relationship.

The eggs. Billy is talking to Nathan while Liz beats the eggs. Billy takes the bowl from her. Nathan asks why. Billy says it’s so she can focus on talking to Nathan but she’s not talking. Liz says it’s because Billy thinks she doesn’t do it right and he agrees.

It’s the first of many times we see him setting the parameters of what she can and cannot do. He says she’s weird, not normal, thinks differently. He is disempowering her at every turn.

When Nathan shows this scene to Amanda, she sees what I see. When they get to the house, Amanda grabs the bowl. Any woman who’s been in an abusive relationship or knows someone who has sees exactly what this is. Amanda is horrified, just like me.

The story of intimate partner abuse is the same as the story of an MLM or a cult. Someone is lost and looking for an anchor. A predator finds them and makes them feel safe and special. The predator starts to exert control “for their own good”. The victim cedes control because they don’t trust themselves. The predator takes more and more control until the victim has nothing left.

When I left the theater, the first thing I said was, “that man will murder her.”

When Billy talks about Twitter and the power of attorney, the only thing I could think of was Jamie Spears (Britney’s father) saying “I am Britney Spears!”.

Billy Evans is a predator and if they stay together he will hurt her. And no one is talking about it.


r/A24 • • 22h ago

Discussion Just found out there’s a whole Theranos sub that’s been discussing this since way before the documentary

Post image
360 Upvotes

r/A24 • • 1d ago

Discussion YCSE and the Pink Pineapple, subtle layer of artifice

966 Upvotes

There's a scene in YCSE where Nathan asks Billy what they're eating and he casually remarks it's a pink pineapple. It's a small interaction but there's a hilarious layer metaphor in it.

Pink Pineapples like that are sold with the top of them cut off with advertising saying so you can see inside. But the reality is, you can grow pineapples from their tops alone. It's a business thing so you can't steal the cultivar and grow your own.

You can see inside, but never come up with your own. Just like all the people and the events in this movie.

I don't know if they left that in there to get that deep, but Nathan faked a whole ass singing show to contrive a way to get pilots experience in giving feedback to people lol


r/A24 • • 23h ago

Discussion One thing people aren't talking about enough from YCSE

391 Upvotes

(very mild spoilers ahead but not spoilery if you have watched The Rehearsal or Nathan For You)

The idea that we as a viewer not only have an unreliable narrator (Nathan), unreliable focal points in the film (Elizabeth/Billy).

But eventually, we as viewers do not even trust our own judgement. And I think this is the biggest feat of the movie.

I sincerely don't know the last time my own perspective/understanding of the reality of a film has been so distorted. And I know the internet has already glazed this movie to death. The layers of deception I experienced within my own mind while watching was something I rarely experience in film.

I'm watching The Rehearsal for the first time, and from this and Nathan For You we see glimpses of this specific magic. And I think it's just such a joy seeing someone's talent evolve over-time while still including all the elements that made it amazing in the first place.

Edit: I wasn't going to include this cause it felt a bit shameless, but I made a little video which expands my thoughts above. If you are curious.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEMKZb1069U


r/A24 • • 9h ago

Question Go in blind or well educated?

21 Upvotes

Hi!
I’m going to use my free ticket to see You Can See Everything tomorrow and I want to know:
Should I read up on Theranos and Elizabeth Holmes with articles on the web
Or
Should I just go in blind with the very little information I remember from when it all happened?
Do I need to know much about Theranos and EH beforehand to get the best experience?
Or does the movie stand independently without requiring prior knowledge?
Thank you.


r/A24 • • 12h ago

Question YCSE: Timeline Question Spoiler

40 Upvotes

Saw the film on Monday and absolutely loved it. It’s been swirling in my head ever since but one particular sequence has been nagging at me and I wanted to see if anyone else has insight into when it might have been filmed.

If I recall correctly, in the dinner table scene Billy says that Amanda has been dragged on social media “for the past six months,” and then reveals that it was related to the shooting of Charlie Kirk. That seemingly puts the dinner table interaction around March 2026, give or take.

Then, a little later in the film, we see Nathan try to arrange a call with Liz for December 19 (2025).

Do we think Billy misspoke when he said “six months” and the dinner table scene was filmed between mid-September to mid-December, 2025? Or is it possible the table scene was filmed after the attempted phone call and placed earlier in the sequence of the movie?


r/A24 • • 14h ago

Discussion Milly Shapiro, breakout star of Ari Aster's 2018 A24 horror film HEREDITARY, is doing an AMA/Q&A in /r/movies today, for anyone interested.

Post image
52 Upvotes

I organized an AMA/Q&A with actress Milly Shapiro. You may know her from her breakout role in Ari Aster's 2018 Hereditary, or from her Tony Award-winning performance as Maltilda on Broadway in 2013 in Matilda the Musical. She stars in Hallowarrior, her first film since Hereditary (!), which is a Halloween-themed horror thriller that premiered at Tribeca a few months ago and was just released last weekend.

It's live here now in r/movies for anyone interested in asking her a question:

https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1xbl9fe/hi_reddit_im_milly_shapiro_from_hereditary/

She will be back at around 3 PM ET today to answer questions. I recommend asking in advance. Please ask there, not here. All questions are much appreciated!

Hallowarrior info:

Synopsis: Halloween-obsessed Pumpkin thinks she's the last person alive. But when scavengers show up at her doorstep, Pumpkin has no choice but to tap into her deadliest survival instincts.

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORjn6ox53_U

Thank you :)


r/A24 • • 21h ago

Discussion I left You Can See Everything talking about real people like they were fictional characters

196 Upvotes

It’s one of the most cinematic documentaries I’ve ever seen. The way it’s shot makes everything feel so intentional that I almost stopped processing it as something that actually happened. I found myself talking about real people like they were characters someone had written.

Then Amanda comes in to reenact scenes, and that feeling gets even harder to shake. I could follow what was happening, but I started questioning the footage I’d already accepted as real. How much was spontaneous? How much changed because a camera was there? Were those conversations actually unscripted? I honestly don’t know where to draw that line.

What’s interesting is that Nathan seems caught up in trying to understand what’s real and what’s a performance, and by the end, I felt caught up in that same uncertainty.
There’s something unsettling about having to remind yourself that these people exist outside the movie. These are their actual lives, even when the filmmaking makes them feel fictional.

Usually, leaving a documentary, I’m thinking about what I just learned. Leaving this one, I was trying to understand what I’d just witnessed.


r/A24 • • 1d ago

Discussion Elizabeth Holmes’ tweets about her kids Spoiler

Thumbnail gallery
634 Upvotes

After watching YCSE and realizing that:

  1. EH and Billy got together after EH was accused of fraud, and
  2. EH and Billy still chose to have children knowing she was likely going to prison

I can’t help but realize that part of the big manipulation going on here is likely the additional victimhood that EH receives being an imprisoned mother rather than just an imprisoned woman.

EH and Billy met in 2017, after the SEC had already charged her with fraudulent capital fundraising. EH and Billy had their first child in 2021- in the midst of EH’s federal fraud trial. Making the choice to have and raise children knowing there was a high likelihood of one of the parents impending incarceration is wild.

I’m not saying EH and Billy don’t love their children, but after watching the movie it’s apparent that EH is incredibly manipulative (whether she is doing it consciously or unconsciously). And she (read: Billy) is constantly tweeting about her children in a way that is clearly trying to garner sympathy. I would argue that their choice to have kids was probably impacted by the idea that it could be beneficial to her image and potential early release.

EDIT:
Yes, I know Billy is actually tweeting on her behalf. I called them her tweets in the title because it is her Twitter account and also a spoiler to say otherwise. Also mistakenly said they’re married when they’re not.


r/A24 • • 9h ago

Fan Art/OC The Green Knight alternative poster

Post image
11 Upvotes

Made an alternative movie poster for the Green Knight with a vintage / storybook feel to it


r/A24 • • 15m ago

Discussion My burning question for You Can See Everything, regarding the filmmakers potentially committing a federal crime lol (spoilers) Spoiler

• Upvotes

(SPOILERS)

.

.

.

I had SO many feelings and thoughts and have continued having them after watching You Can See Everything last night, but one thing that I haven't been able to stop thinking about, and haven't seen folks talking about much at all...Nathan was so extremely focused on accuracy for the making of this film. What do we think the chances are that he snuck an audio recorder of some kind into that prison? Is that even possible? I just can't imagine...I know there was the scene of him changing the word that Elizabeth said to "something" because he couldn't quite remember, but the thing is...if they DID manage to sneak a secret audio recording device into the prison, they would literally never be able to talk about it, as it would be some kind of federal crime. But based on the time that he observed on the candy machine of Elizabeth coming out, to when Billy finally arrived, that had to be like 25-30 minutes, right? So unless...Nathan practiced memorization techniques and immediately got back in his car and either dictated or furiously wrote down literally everything he could remember, I just don't see it being accurate enough for his exacting standards. I do think it brings up some interesting points about the imperfections of human recollection, and kinda ties into the NYT reporter's quote and the exact accuracy of what folks did and did not say, but I also could just really see Nathan taking a huge risk like that to ensure that he properly documented everything to the best of his ability. Especially with (Nathan For You & The Rehearsal SPOILERS ahead) Nathan pulling stunts in the past like the tightrope walk or learning to fly a commercial airliner, I could really just see him pulling something like that off.

I am ready for people to tell me that it is impossible and that I am wrong, but the recounting of the scene with Amanda Seyfried from afterwards seemed too...accurate and specific to have solely relied on human memory!


r/A24 • • 3h ago

Shitpost Our love is God

Thumbnail
youtu.be
2 Upvotes

I can't think about their relationship without thinking of this song. Yeah, the movie was three hours. But I'm seeing so much


r/A24 • • 9m ago

News (Australia) Preview screenings on sale for advanced screening of YCSE on November 11

• Upvotes

Only one day early but oh well. So far just Palace and Dendy but I think the big cinema chains will probably add preview sessions too

Many sessions sold out or almost sold out so be quick.


r/A24 • • 1d ago

Shitpost YCSE

Post image
585 Upvotes