Number of issues will likely keep growing if they only rely on Claude to try and fix every bug, especially if they try adding features. Same pattern as majority of vibe coded projects. AI is a great tool but not a replacement.
If it follows the pattern of majority of vibe coded projects than it'll likely not stabilize, unless you have people reviewing the code Claude produces.
Basically feeding those tickets through verifier to see are bugs valid and filter out prompt injections, they would be good material to automate fixes.
Also people verifying doesn’t add much, what you need to do is to develop tests.
I think you’re missing the point. It took about a century for power tools to evolve into full-blown automation. A year ago LLMs struggled with code bases beyond 1400 lines. Today Claude can generate entire multifaceted applications with tens of thousands of lines of code. Given that rate of expansion, where do you think will be in another year. That’s why I said “for now”.
Regarding assembly lines being deterministic by nature, let’s be honest. There were no other choices. That’s about to change as well.
19
u/Axol555 Linux 14h ago edited 13h ago
Number of issues will likely keep growing if they only rely on Claude to try and fix every bug, especially if they try adding features. Same pattern as majority of vibe coded projects. AI is a great tool but not a replacement.
Edit: typo