The response was their fault. Evidence even suggests that the cops may have shot some kids on accident. They also kept parents from helping their own children when the police refused.Â
When the response from 300 cops is fumbled and kids die due to it, it's the governments fault. In this case the Republicans government for decades.Â
Yeah, Iâm interested to see how youâre going to spin a bungled police response as âthe Republicanâs fault.â This is like blaming the 1992 LA riots on Democrats or saying the Democrats are responsible for nuking Japan because Truman happened to be a democrat.
People vote for Republican policy of dumping more money into police and the head of police, not schools.Â
Shooter shows up, police do nothing and might have even shot some kids.Â
People still vote for these policies and head of police, even when they botched handling a single shooter while having 300+ cops and kept parents from trying to save the children.Â
Republicans policies kill people. Plain and simple.Â
We aren't talking about Nashville, we are talking about uvalde and how they vote for the people who let their children die with 300 cops outside.Â
But if you want to play whataboutism, what about banning abortion so more women are dying from either complications or back alley abortion? That's a Republican policy. How about the war on Iran? what about no food for kids in school for free? What about banning heat protection for workers?I can keep going on the policies of Republicans that kill people.Â
When that government refuses to address the real gun problem in this country and refuses to address the funding for mental health (well really health in general) then it is a government problem.
There is no "gun problem" in the US. Columbine happened in the middle of the Assault Weapons ban that everyone thinks will fix this problem. The US also did not fund any kind of mental health for most of it's existence when teenagers would literally drive to school with a rifle in their vehicle. There were no school shootings then.
But nobody wants to blame the real problem: Parents that have raised undisciplined children. This is a direct response to the organized and deliberate destruction of the family.
Yeah, I know you believe the hype because you just said âdozens.â Itâs extremely rare for a mass shooting in the US to have more than 4 victims, rarer still to have a dozen. You donât know what youâre talking about.
Definitions vary, but mass shootings are usually considered to be ones where there are 4 or more victims. So it makes sense that most are at that level. But in any case, my point was that the attacks you read about abroad are in this range because they are so rare. The ones you read about in the U.S. often need to have a bigger body count just to make the news. My point is that no one is pulling off a Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook, Pulse Night Club, Mandalay Bay, El Paso Walmart, Parkland, Uvalde or any of the many, many more that have dozens â way more than four â victims with a knife.
I donât know about that. There were two shootings with 10+ victims in Austria and Sweden last year. And of course there was the tragic Moscow shooting that killed 149 people in 2024. The problem is, his kind of thing barely registers in American news, or if it does, we simply donât remember it. The attacks we read about abroad are actually quite a bit more significant than just 4 people. So really, those kinds of Uvalde, Pulse night club, etc. type events are happening abroad. We just donât really hear too much about them.
Have you even bothered to look up whether other countries banned guns after mass shootings and what happened after? Australia is a notable example, and Itâs quite literally a famous argument FOR gun control.
Just a cursory google brought up these. Hope they help.
Australia does not border Mexico which is a famous argument AGAINST gun control, which also tightly regulates firearm possession and still has a gun homicide rate 4 times higher than the US. So Iâm glad for Australia, but Australia doesnât guarantee success when there are so many failed examples like Mexico.
Look, man, Iâm from the south. I know how important guns can be for a sense of identity, community, and safety. I totally support peopleâs rights to have certain firearms â like hunting rifles and shotguns etc â for sport and safety. There are also some measures, like required courses or memberships to hunting clubs etc, and technologies, like fingerprint triggers, that could make even more powerful and specialized guns safe to own and use. But the problem we have is we are pumping out weapons of war without much care for where they end up or who ultimately uses them. They end up in the hands of troubled people here, sure. But Iâm glad you brought up Mexico because they also end up in the hands of violent criminals abroad. That is often overlooked in this debate, but you spotted it. Guns and ammo legally purchased in the U.S. often cross the southern border, where they help cartels enact incredible levels of violence. (The NYT even had a a story this year about how much of the ammo the cartels use was made by a U.S. Army plant that makes the same ammo for the civilian market.) And that violence causes both immigrants and illicit drugs to flow into our country.
Australia maybe worked because it isnât close to the U.S. But Mexico has to deal with both us and cartels.
Itâs not really as simple as you make it. You ought to look up Operation Fast and Furious sometime where the government intentionally allowed US gun laws to be broken in order to do exactly what you are describing. Those guns are still found today at crime scenes. That wasnât just legal guns being smuggled to Mexico, that was a bungled operation to track guns into Mexico.
But the interesting part about that, the ATF had to intervene and allow that to happen. The ATF had to allow exactly what you describe (straw purchasing) to take place. So we do already have fairly strict rules and enforcement that prevents straw purchasing. I wonât deny that it happens, but I also want to point out itâs significantly more complex than just a legal gun is bought in the US and taken to Mexico.
5
u/dagoth_ith 12h ago
Look into uvalde and how even though their kids got murdered due to republican policies and inactions, they still voted red...